Okay...
Is it just me or is anyone else pissed off at this whole Madonna-Malawian baby boy thing? What I'm having a problem with is why the media is giving her such a hard time for adopting that baby. Angelina Jolie can walk her happy ass into Cambodia or whatever African nation that she adopted Zahara from and the whole world talks about what a good deed that she is doing and how she's such an amazing parent full of love. The bitch wore a vial of Billy Bob's blood around her neck for heaven's sake! Not to mention the fact that she's a homewrecking slut. (Sorry to sound so harsh but I really, really, really have a problem with infidelity. Another topic, another blog.)
Yet, Madonna, who's only real issue is the fact that she had a bit of a checkered past and that unfortunate decision to have a gold tooth during her 'Erotica' years. Oh, and the fact that she banged Vanilla Ice. And Big Daddy Kane. At the same time, apparently. Which reminds me I never did get a gander at that 'Sex' book so if anyone happens to have a copy of that, hit me back.
One of the major arguments that I hear is that if Madonna really wanted to help the little boy, she would provide money to his family and his village. 'He has a father. Help the father to raise the boy." What a load of shit! Everyday here in the United States people adopt children who have living families. Mothers, fathers, grandparents. When a wealthy couple is looking to adopt, we don't tell them that they should just help the parents financially. No, we let them buy that kid.
Another argument is that Madonna didn't follow the laws of Malawi. Well, duh! When was the last time a celebrity had to follow the law? They get special treatment. The more money you have, the more doors are open to you. It's a sad but true fact of the world. Again, I point to Angelina. She was in and out of Zimbabwe with Zahara before anyone could say 'boo.'
Give me a fucking break!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
I don't have a problem with Madonna adopting the child nor do I have problem with Angelina adopting children. The media makes so much out of it, instead of focusing on the nations the celebs are adopting from. Instead they focus on the lavish lifestyles and what not. Whatever.
I agree. For me, there is no issue. The media is blowing this WAY out of proportion. And although I'm not a big Angelina fan, I'm happy that she's adopting babies. I'm just pissed at how the media is portryaing Madonna.
Madonna did a good thing by adopting that little boy. Tell me, could he have had a better existence in that ophanage, than with her? I doubt it.
You said it "Anonymous"!
Indeed, what's the big deal. The lady's doing a great service to mankind and I for one condone her. The media has always been a bunch of whiny, fustrated, (mostly) white men with their own personal issues, who are given pen, paper and allowance to distort truths to fit their own agendas. Why don't they just do us a favour and jack off at one of Madonna's videos, hence(perhaps?) lessening their animosities.
Do lay off Ms Jolie though, you can't wreck something that's already wrecked. Why lay blame solely at her feet?.
Chandra
I don't lay the blame solely at Angelina's feet. I know that Brad had everything to do with the break up of his marriage. I just have a problem with infidelity in general, as you may have read in a previous post.
Post a Comment